Who Shot First?
Modeling,
an essential skill in any writer’s toolkit, is that sort of legal fringe where
plagiarism becomes the art, becomes craft itself. When Jean Rhys wrote Wide Sargasso Sea, she modeled extensively
on Jane Eyre, almost foreshadowing today’s
fan-fiction. At times Rhys’ excess was a detriment to her narrative, which
could have been a brilliant standalone novel.
Christopher Chik |
Should
someone escape Jane Eyre’s torturous
grasp during high school tenure, he could still read Wide Sargasso Sea with complete understanding. The average reader
has a closer connection to Kevin Bacon than Rhys’ work has to Brontë’s, because
the timeline order of the two novels is inverted. WSS is an origin story for Brontë’s character, Bertha Rochester, but
takes place a half century later.
The
central tension in WSS, which Rhys
uses to explain Bertha’s craziness in Jane
Eyre, is only possible because of the unique historical climate the so
tightly woven into the narrative. The racial tension in the Creole culture
exists because of an 1833 Emancipation Act that freed slaves in all British
colonies. The events in Jane Eyre
take place roughly forty years prior to that act, around the turn of the
century. By contrast, Jane Eyre’s
central tension hinges on how Jane will resolve her love for Bertha’s husband
if she is alive, well, and crazy up in the attic.
Bertha
would have been kept a secret by an aristocratic family in either time period,
but in the Jane Eyre timeline, it’s
more plausible for Bertha to be locked away in the home instead of an asylum.
Mental institutions weren’t as plentiful and didn’t have the prominence they
would in the late 19th century. As a little girl in the 1830s, Rhys’
version of Bertha would be well into the 1840s before she married Rochester. By
the time she was a completely filled bag of crazy, locked away in an attic, time
would have slipped into the latter half of the century. By then, WSS as a prequel becomes as plausible as
Greedo shooting first.
When a
writer’s efforts to model on others begins to undercut her own effort, as with
Rhys, the work becomes more of an homage or poor tribute to the original piece,
than something of true literary merit. There are moments in WSS where the modeling goes so far, the
pieces seem shoehorned: Bertha’s doppelganger, Antionette, seeks out a voodoo
woman who sets in motion the events necessary to make the Jane Eyre narrative happen in the future; Rochester’s doppelganger
mentions he’d trade his eyes, something he loses in Jane Eyre, to have never married Bertha. It’s unfortunate Rhys
chose to take her modeling to such an extreme, because she wrote a brilliant
novel, which explores an interesting time and place.
Antoinette
is an intriguing protagonist in her own right and deserves to be her own bag and
blend of crazy. Everything about her circumstances is interesting and relatable
in ways that neither Jane nor Bertha proved to be, throughout Jane Eyre. Short of a butler, live-in
maid, or a nanny, who really identifies with Jane on any level beyond love that
can or should not be? Anyone can identify with a woman driven to madness by
insufferable circumstances; anyone can sympathize with a little girl growing up
in the middle of racial tension and horrible violence. The reader doesn’t need
Brontë’s Bertha to feel deeply for Rhys’ Antoinette.
As a
writer, modeling should be an exercise; it should be a tool for improving the
craft and developing one’s own stories, through inspiration from the past. We
should emulate the great authors who inspire us. We should strive to understand
what makes their voices unique, dissect the humble beauty of their sentences,
and reprocess it all through our own lenses and pens. Going too far with our
modeling, doesn’t always doom us to plagiarism. Sometimes, a runaway modeling
exercise just creates too large an anchor, which then drags our writing down
from a level at which it could have been.
Never be
afraid to let your own voice shine brightly through your disguises, modeled on
the great writing of others. That’s how we get Bradbury’s Leviathan ’99, brilliantly modeled on Moby Dick. Otherwise, we get lip-service fan-fiction. On the plus
side, instead of Twilight, when someone writes Jane Eyre fan-fiction, we get something far more literary than
Fifty Shades of Gray.
Follow Chris on the interwebs:
Email – christopherm.chik@gmail.com
Website – www.occupymars.net
Twitter – @g1mpy
8 comments:
Some great examples and advice. I'm impressed with the depth and breadth of your examples - I am already planning to model a lecture from it.
But what was "Twilight" modeled on?
Thanks. :) I cannibalized a paper I'd written on WSS for a lit course in my undergrad. I made it less formal, and updated it with the stuff I learned since starting the program.
A wretched dream about shiny men in forests?
I remember when I was studying during the 90s when Raymond Carver was the big model, there was an awful lot of awful modelling going on....interesting post.
It's interesting you mention Carver. I've just been reading quite a bit of him. I can definitely see the use in modeling from him. There is so, so very little telling going on, just pure scene and showing.
In "What We Talk About When We Talk About Love" I came across, I think, just one instance. That's pretty lean and pure prose.
Did you dislike Carver or the extensive modelling on his prose? I'd definitely be interested. :)
Wow. This was fascinating. So useful. I am very grateful. I will have to read it a few more times! Cathy x
Post a Comment